NMN Human Clinical Trials: What the Studies Show

The Longevity Series · Research

NMN Human Clinical Trials

The published human NMN trials, described by study design only: who took part, how many people, what daily dose and for how long. We deliberately do not summarise outcomes — NMN has no authorised UK health claim, and small, short trials cannot tell you what NMN will do for you.

7 trials listed 10–108 participants 250–900mg efficacy-trial doses 0 authorised health claims Updated 5 Oct 2026
Quick answer

Small trials, described by design.

Human trials of NMN (nicotinamide mononucleotide) exist, but they are small (tens of participants, up to 108) and short (a single dose up to 12 weeks). The efficacy trials used 250–900mg a day; one safety study used 1250mg a day for four weeks. This page tells you how each study was built, not what it found.

Core trials
Yoshino 2021 · Igarashi 2022 · Kim 2022 · Fukamizu 2022 · Yi 2023Plus Liao 2021 (runners) and Irie 2020 (single dose), both checked against the published papers
Participants
10 to 108 per trialHealthy adults, older adults, and postmenopausal women with prediabetes
Efficacy-trial doses
250–900mg per day250mg in three trials; 300, 600 or 900mg in Yi 2023. Dose context: NMN dosage
Safety study
1250mg per day, 4 weeksFukamizu et al., Scientific Reports 2022, 31 healthy adults
Duration
Single dose to 12 weeksNo long-term human trial exists. Timescales: how long NMN takes to work
UK status
NMN not yet authorisedGB novel food application RP-2116 under assessment; zero authorised claims
UK regulatory status — read this first

NMN is widely sold in the UK but its position is not settled: a GB novel food application for β-NMN (FSA reference RP-2116) is under assessment by the Food Standards Agency, and EFSA published a positive safety opinion in the EU in 2026 with formal authorisation still pending. No authorised UK or EU health claim exists for NMN, so we describe the research by design only — population, size, dose and duration — and make no claim about effects.

The evidence base

The human trials, in context.

Interest in NMN comes from its role as a precursor in the body's production of NAD+, a coenzyme found in every cell. Most early NMN research was done in cells and animals. The human evidence base is younger and much smaller: mostly randomised, placebo-controlled studies with participant numbers in the tens, running for weeks, not years.

Because the trials differ in population, dose, duration and what they measured, they are not directly comparable — and because none of them supports an authorised health claim, we do not report their results. If you want to read the outcomes, every paper is on our research references page.

For how these study doses relate to products, see NMN 500mg vs 1000mg and the side-by-side compare NMN table. For timing questions, when to take NMN covers the one trial that compared morning and evening intake.

At a glance

Key NMN trials, by design.

Population, size, daily dose and duration as stated in each published paper. This is not a complete list of all NMN research, and it deliberately has no results column.

Study Population n Daily dose Duration Design
Yoshino et al., Science 2021 Postmenopausal women with prediabetes 25 250mg 10 weeks Randomised, placebo-controlled
Igarashi et al., npj Aging 2022 Healthy older men 42 250mg 12 weeks Randomised, placebo-controlled
Kim et al., Nutrients 2022 Adults aged 65+ 108 250mg 12 weeks Morning vs evening intake arms
Yi et al., GeroScience 2023 Healthy middle-aged adults 80 300 / 600 / 900mg 60 days Randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging
Fukamizu et al., Sci Rep 2022 Healthy adults 31 1250mg 4 weeks Safety study
Liao et al., J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2021 Recreationally trained runners aged 27–50 48 300 / 600 / 1200mg 6 weeks Randomised, placebo-controlled, alongside exercise training
Irie et al., Endocrine Journal 2020 Healthy men 10 100 / 250 / 500mg Single dose Non-randomised, single-dose safety and metabolism study

Study designs, populations and measurement methods differ, so the trials should not be read as directly comparable. The efficacy trials above used 250–900mg/day, except Liao 2021, which included a 1200mg arm. Full citations: research references.

Reading the research

What the trials measured.

It helps to separate the types of measurement the trials used, because they are different kinds of evidence. A laboratory marker is not the same as a health outcome, and none of these supports an authorised claim.

Blood NAD+ and related metabolites. The most common measurement: blood samples before and after supplementation. It is a laboratory readout of what is in the blood, not a measure of how anyone feels or functions. Background: what is NAD+.

Physical tests. Some trials added walking tests, grip strength or exercise-capacity measures, recorded in a small group over a short window.

Metabolic markers. A few trials looked at blood chemistry such as insulin-related markers, as exploratory measures in small groups.

Safety panels. Trials monitored standard blood tests, vital signs and reported side effects at the dose used.

We list what was measured, not what was found. That is the honest scope for an ingredient with no authorised health claim.

Tolerability

Safety in the trials, by design.

Every trial listed monitored safety, and one was built specifically for it: Fukamizu et al. (Scientific Reports, 2022) gave 31 healthy adults 1250mg of NMN a day for four weeks. Irie et al. (2020) looked at single doses of 100, 250 and 500mg in 10 healthy men. All of these windows are short. Long-term human safety data for NMN does not exist.

For the side-effect question in full, read NMN side effects. Trial data does not replace advice from a healthcare professional about your own situation.

Research only applies if a product actually contains what its label says. See how to check for genuine NMN — test method, batch numbers and an accredited laboratory.

Next step

From study doses to labels.

We make and sell NMN. Every batch is tested by an ISO/IEC 17025-accredited laboratory and UK manufactured. Compare our formulas' NMN dose against the trial range.

FAQs

NMN trials FAQ.

Yes. Published human NMN trials include Yoshino et al. (Science, 2021), Igarashi et al. (npj Aging, 2022), Kim et al. (Nutrients, 2022), Fukamizu et al. (Scientific Reports, 2022) and Yi et al. (GeroScience, 2023). They are small, with 25 to 108 participants, and ran for 4 to 12 weeks. We describe them by design only, not by outcome.
The 2023 human NMN trial most often cited is Yi et al. (GeroScience, 2023): a randomised, placebo-controlled study in 80 healthy middle-aged adults taking 300, 600 or 900mg of NMN a day for 60 days. We describe trials by design only and do not summarise their outcomes, because NMN has no authorised UK health claim. The full paper is listed on our research references page.
The efficacy trials listed here used 250–900mg of NMN per day: 250mg in Yoshino 2021, Igarashi 2022 and Kim 2022, and 300, 600 or 900mg in Yi 2023. Fukamizu 2022 was a four-week safety study at 1250mg per day. These are study doses, not a recommendation; follow the label of any product you use.
Mostly not. The trials were built around laboratory and physical measurements, such as blood NAD+ and its metabolites, physical tests and standard safety blood panels, with questionnaires in a few. We do not summarise their results, and NMN has no authorised UK health claim, so this page makes no claim about how NMN makes anyone feel.
Every trial listed monitored safety, and Fukamizu et al. (Scientific Reports, 2022) was designed specifically as a safety study: 31 healthy adults taking 1250mg per day for four weeks. The trials were short and small, so long-term human safety data does not exist. We do not summarise trial outcomes here; see our NMN side effects guide and speak to a healthcare professional before use.
This page describes the main human NMN trials by design: who took part, how many, what dose and for how long. Our research references page is the underlying citation list. Use this page for the overview and the references page to find each paper.
NMN is widely sold in the UK but its position is not settled. A GB novel food application for β-NMN (FSA reference RP-2116) is under assessment by the Food Standards Agency. EFSA published a positive safety opinion in the EU in 2026, with formal authorisation still pending. No authorised UK or EU health claim exists for NMN.
About this guide

Last reviewed 5 October 2026 by the Vitality Supplements Editorial Team, written to our editorial standards. We make and sell NMN products, which is why this page describes the research by design only and does not summarise outcomes. Each trial's population, size, dose and duration was checked against the published paper. First published 28 July 2026; rebuilt 5 October 2026 with corrected trial details, an unverifiable trial entry removed, and the UK regulatory status added.

Food supplements should not be used as a substitute for a varied, balanced diet and a healthy lifestyle. Do not exceed the stated recommended daily dose. NMN is not yet an authorised novel food in Great Britain (application RP-2116 under assessment). No authorised UK or EU health claims exist for NMN, and no medicinal, disease or anti-ageing claims are made. Not suitable for children. Consult a healthcare professional before use if pregnant, breastfeeding, taking medication or under medical supervision. General information, not medical advice. See our disclaimer · Contact